Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Jerry Narace

Tuesday, July 29th, 2008 |

One man says we are living under a dictatorship. The other asks, “What are you talking about? This isn’t dictatorship. Pinochet, now that was a dictator.”

Sometimes it’s so easy to identify with the first guy.

I found this story reading one of my new favourite blogs Media Watch. I never watched more than a few seconds of any of Sasha Mohammed’s pieces on the health system in Trinidad and Tobago this week. So I can’t comment on the veracity of Ms. Mohammed’s information or criticisms of its supposed anti-government slant. However I will admit that her work makes me a little uneasy sometimes. Considering I am no fan of the Government that’s saying a lot.

So the story is that TV6’s Sasha Mohammed does this week-long in depth piece about the health sector from which I gather that the government didn’t look too good. Subsequently the Minister of Health, Jerry Narace, hot under the collar for what he calls “inaccuracies”, “unfair statements” and the “lack of balance”, appears on the TV6 set to be “interviewed” by Sasha Mohammed (in a minute you’ll see why I used quotation marks). However instead of Jerry Narace, Heinrich Himmler shows up at the TV6 newsroom, not to be interviewed, but to inform the nation of the evils of CCN.

***NOTE: Apparently TV6 complained to YouTube about the copyright infringement and the video was removed. Geez, these people know nothing about publicity.***

I would have thought that Minister Narace would have wanted to come in and discuss with Sasha Mohammed the source of her facts and pit his against hers. If I were Minster of Health, I would want to show the nation how she was wrong - embarrass her if I could. Why not let the truth come out? Instead, Himmler comes in, reads off a bunch of stats, and refuses any attempt by Ms. Mohammed to interview him - which is probably the way he wanted it. After all, he is the Minister of Health and his word should count for more than that of a lowly reporter. Once he speaks, the citizenry will shed whatever foolish beliefs they held after viewing Ms. Mohammed’s piece, right?

In essence all Mr. Narace did was to bury the truth in an unmarked grave. How is anyone supposed to find out what the truth is? She said her piece, he said his, but what’s the truth? It occurred to me that Mr. Narace’s appearance on TV6 was not to comfort worried citizens, but to bludgeon them with his stats. As bad as this may sound, this fits in perfectly with my own personal view of Mr. Narace i.e. I’m not convinced he’s in government because of a burning desire to serve the people. I’m also not sure he’s the kind of person that stays up at night worrying about the poor and disadvantaged.

Sasha Mohammed also deserves some criticism for that debacle of an interview. Jerry Narace just can’t walk onto the TV6 set and silence her with his finger. This isn’t a post-cabinet news conference. This was Sasha’s turf and she should have been more forceful in making the Minister know that. Kudos to her for having the testicular fortitude to end the interview, but by that time the damage was done and she had already shown herself to be a tad bit weak. Of course I am just the armchair analyst.

Balisiers on a Plane

Thursday, February 21st, 2008 |


I wasn’t quite sure what to think when I saw this story on the news last night. Yes the balisier is a flower - a pretty flower at that - and it makes up part of the flora of Trinidad and Tobago. However, the balisier is also the political symbol of the ruling PNM, which makes the situation a little dicey when someone decides to use the flower outside of the political arena. So when Caribbean Airlines, a national airline, employs the use of a balisier on some of the planes, I have to wonder who’s doing the thinking over there.

The plus (or minus, depending on how you look at it) is that both the balisier used by the PNM and the balisier used in this painting are true representations of what the flower looks like and not some over-the-top, Pablo Picassoesque artists’s interpretation of it. So you can say either that (1) the artist employed by Caribbean Airlines did not necessarily use the PNM’s symbol or (2) it’s the same balisier and that now that it’s widely accepted as a political symbol, it can’t be used anywhere else ESPECIALLY not on Government property.

If they had used the UNC’s rising sun symbol as opposed to a sunrise, now that would have been trouble. Clearly one is an artist’s interpretation of the other and it would be sheer madness to use the former instead of the latter.

Me? I’m wondering why the folks over at Caribbean Airlines would so willingly court the ire of a very divided society when it was oh so avoidable. They were bound to know that this was going to be a contentious issue. Why not use the Chaconia, our national flower, instead? The whole thing is neither here nor there with me, but I think that either someone wasn’t thinking at all or that they were thinking way too much. And the conspiracy theorist in this Manicou leans towards the latter. But say wha.

Poor flower. It never signed up for up for this bacchanal. It was happy just growing up in the forest being a flower. I guess that’s the price it pays for being pretty. No one’s clamouring to place a banana flower on plane or party - lucky it.

Stop!

Monday, February 18th, 2008 |

There are some things that about Trinbago that disturb me a great deal. Yes crime is a big issue, so are food prices, homelessness etc, but what really worries me a lot is our rhetoric.

Last week while I was browsing Facebook profiles, I came across this group: called F*** the PNM.

Just because a man is a member of a political party or votes a certain way that does not make him evil. Yes many people are misguided, many let race decide how they vote, but to call everyone who voted for the PNM racial and dotish is unproductive.

Man, is stick we stick in this rut? I could just be since I don’t talk like that and I try to be a little more diplomatic than that, that I was offended as I was. But upon reading this, I was dismayed. I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m about ready for people to start voting their consciences and stop voting party - in fact I’m in a hurry for that to happen. So when I read thing like that it feels as though we’re not really making any progress.

And if you see the people in this 356 member group - young smart-looking people. Some even university educated.

Sometimes I feel T&T will be a much better place if we could just tone down the political rhetoric a little. If we could just watch what we say and learn to express ourselves more constructively, we’d be in a much better place than we are now. Yes I understand that people are angry and that people need to vent some steam. But at some point they will have to realize that they are making things progressively worse.

At the end of it all what is the goal here? If the makers of the group are trying to propagate the same type of tribalism by setting people even firmer in their ways than they are now,then they are on the right track. But if they want to get people to think for themselves and change voting patterns, then an “F*** the PNM” group on Facebook couldn’t possible be the way to do it. You can’t woo people over to your side by insulting them - a point lost on some politicians.

It’s a sad thing when people use great vehicles such as social networking sites to spread this kind of rhetoric. And I have to wonder how much longer thing will carry on in this manner before we get the point, which is that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. If we don’t get the point, pretty soon we will become a country of angry, belligerent people capable only of hurling the basest of insults towards each other and incapable of any kind of civility or fraternity.

In the end it boils down to what we as a people want and what we are going to do to get it. It’s entirely within the rights of the group’s founders to say what they want, but nasty rhetoric probably won’t get them (or us) anywhere. People who are genuinely interested in seeing Trinidad prosper, I feel, would choose their words more carefully than that.

Captain, Your Ship is Sinking

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008 |

Captain Gary Griffith’s boat has sprung a leak. Actually, his letter leaked. Captain Gary Griffith left me speechless a couple days ago. A lot of you might know that COP member Captain Gary Griffith’s name has been in the news a lot recently, but what happened two days ago may shock you.

Just to update you on the story so far. Gary Griffith, in a letter leaked to the press, criticized COP Political Leader Winston Dookeran for his leadership style. Then my boy Gary Griffith instead of choosing not to comment on the letter, takes a sledge hammer to the leak and decides, “Oh yeah, I’ll grant the Express an interview“. What a leak! Said Mr. Griffith:

Winston Dookeran has become a law unto himself.

“Our political leader was selected rather than elected and we need to have some electoral process to have the full support of the 148,000. I don’t think we can get an extra vote with Winston Dookeran as the political leader.”

Dookeran, while not responding specifically to Gary Griffith’s comments, said,

“…We are proceeding very well and there are lots of people who are working and working at all levels, from the bottom level to the top level of the COP all over the country.

“We are working to keep that alive and I am doing my part to ensure that happens,”

To which Gary Griffith graciously replied,

“For him to say that we are moving forward and everything is working well, that is a figment of his imagination.”

It’s quite a coincidence that the letter leaked just as Gary Griffith is about to team up with Jack Warner to create a anti-crime plan for Chaguanas West. Could this be the same Gary Griffith who not too long ago was touting the greatness of Winston Dookeran?

With that being as bad as it Captain Gary Griffith made it infinitely worse when he called Anil Chris and Sprang on the Powerdive as the topic was being discussed so as to to lambaste Anil Roberts for discussing the topic on air. The man was in full bacchanal mode:

“Yuh loudmouth, hypocrite. I like how yuh doing the same thing yuh criticize me for. You is the reason why we loss the election. Yuh want to hang up on me? Go ahead, yuh duck and run just like yuh leader!”

Gasp! First of all it wasn’t Anil Roberts who was parading before the media. It was Gary Griffith. Now that Gary Griffith’s letter, and Gary Griffith himself is in the public spotlight, the story is legitimate - something which Gary Griffith seems unable to understand.

Griffith’s accusations are even more interesting considering the report that before last Sunday (where he apologised for the leak and his subsequent comments), he hadn’t been to a COP executive meeting since November 5th or thereabouts. Yet even more interesting was what Gary Griffith said during his apology, “The growing pains which were presently being experienced by the party was a natural aspect in the life of a political party. The party would deal with these growing pains in a professional manner“. Interesting.

The COP issued a press release stating that Mr. Griffith does not speak on behalf of the Congress of the People and that all his appearances in the media haven’t been sanctioned by the party. It’s interesting therefore that this is the very same loose cannon who has accused Mr. Dookeran of becoming a party onto himself. Awkward.

I am sure the COP will weather this as well as the (perhaps) the imminent departure of Mr. Griffith.

It’s Finally Over

Monday, November 12th, 2007 |

Thank God for we PNM yes gyul. Dem Indian and dem talking too much schupidness. - My aunt to my mother.

From her statement some of you might guess that my aunt is some kind of under-educated, swearing, rum-drinking bacchanalist. She is none of these things. My aunt is an educated woman who left her Canadian university one dissertation short of a PhD. She is also a devoutly religious woman.

My point in highlighting this is not to condemn my aunt (although I do condemn her statements), I want to ask you where are we going? When I sit back and look at it all, it’s disheartening. My aunt is by no means an isolated case either in my extended family or the whole of Trinidad and Tobago for that matter. I have an uncle even more educated than his sister there who is guilty of saying things that are just as negative. And I am sure that many of you have been put off by things your near and dear family members have said - things you might not have expected from them. I did not expect this from her after all. A lot of us have come to expect statements like this from wider society, but it’s always more disheartening to hear this coming from our own.

Part of me thinks that we are doomed as a society if we continue to vote on race and religion the way we did on November 5th. I scoff at the people who tell me that the majority of people voted on issues. The way I see it is that the majority people to this day still vote for a party based on skin colour and hair texture.

That having been said, I am proud to have made up that 148,000 that voted for the COP. I would not have voted had it not been for the them and I feel the same is true for many others. Despite what Mr. Panday says, the COP did no “wrong” to the country. We who voted for them did not believe in either the UNC or the PNM. I don’t subscribe to the thought that we should have voted for the UNC-A in order to not “split the vote”. I don’t understand the UNC-A’s notion that if you’ve voted for the UNC in the past, votes are by default theirs and you shouldn’t ever vote for anyone else. Votes are earned on a voter by voter basis and in the minds of COP voters, the UNC-A did not earn their votes. We did what we did, not because it was popular, but because it was right. I would do it all over again if I had to because sometimes you have to stand up for what you believe in regardless of the outcome if only to sleep well at night.

So what we go do people?

P.S. - Contrary to what my aunt thinks, my mother voted COP as did the rest of my immediate family.

I Voted

Monday, November 5th, 2007 |

Did you?

On the 11th Day of Elections

Monday, November 5th, 2007 |

On the 11th Day of Elections My Emperor gave to me:

11 Sprangers Spranging
10 Percent Inflation
9 Tall buildings building
8 Killers killing
7 Weekly floods
6 Cdap drugs
5 Brushcutters
4 Breakfastses
3 Smelters Smelting
2 Blimp what need fixing
And a Cepep wuk down in Caroni.

5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th Days of Elections

Friday, November 2nd, 2007 |

Yes, this is a ratch, but I prefer to call it “fast-tracking”.

On the 9th Day of Elections My Emperor gave to me:

9 Tall buildings building
8 Killers killing
7 Weekly floods
6 Cdap drugs
5 Brushcutters
4 Breakfastses
3 Smelters Smelting
2 Blimp what need fixing
And a Cepep wuk down in Caroni.

The Date Draweth Nigh

Friday, November 2nd, 2007 |
Roadside Plea

Oh gosh allyuh, no ah hear. No Toronto Trini, ah not busy on any “campain” trail (as Afro Chic put it). (1) I’m a little busy (2) I fed up of this elections (3) I fed up of politicians (3) My internet has been acting up. So in all I was a little busy and I wasn’t trying that hard to make time to blog.

As I said I’m tired of all the politics and I can’t wait for this election to be over. I also tired of the constant noise I have to undergo on what seems to be an hourly basis (that Afro Chic also mentioned). I’m tired of dodgy, evasive politicians and disingenuous talk show hosts. And Dr. Amery Brown’s grin and ugly moustache to that list - “I’m so overwhelmed by the response I’ve received from the people of Diego Martin Central. Everyone has been so warm towards me. I am so happy that Ken Valley has fully embraced my candidacy.” Oh give me a chance Dr. Brown, you are fighting a safe seat.

In other election news, guess what came in the mail for me 2 days ago?

The Manicou’s Poll Card

Sorry I can’t bring you photos from inside the booth - phones are illegal on the premises.

Who knows what’s going to happen on Monday? I’m trying not to be too concerned with what the polls say. I know what I have to do, and I plan on doing it. Whatever happens, happens. If the Congress of the People win, then great, if they lose, then at least I did what I thought was right.

Government Ads

Friday, November 2nd, 2007 |

Here what I vex for today. Now I know, that the role of Government is not only to implement programmes and initiatives for its people, but to inform them that such programmes exist and how to access them. Obviously the three most common mediums for this are through the media. Fine. But when one observes the kind of advertising being undertaken by this administration during this election period, it has become obscene. Since this election began, the evening news has become flooded with brand spanking new computer generated ads not alerting the public to programmes available to them, but touting the “Government’s” 2020 vision. And that’s not the only one. Take for example this ad that was in Sunday’s Guardian:

This ad is “advertising” some kind of conference or the other that took place somewhere around Sep 28th. There is no real information in the ad for people who want to access the National Training Agency. And yet there it is - two pages of full colour. My question is, did this ad have to be printed, or could the government have chosen to save taxpayers thousands of dollars by not running such an unnecessary ad? This wasn’t the only ad, by the way.Look at the other offending one (mainly from the Guardian, but I think I got a couple from The Sunday Express too).

So along with an “ad” for the National Training Agency. We have ads for housing, Science and Tertiary Education, Vision 2020 etc neither of which are aiming to share any real information with citizens. But wait, that’s not all. Next we have a 4 page full colour ad for what? For the “Government” to inform the populace that it is building schools. What a waste.

I’ve seen this ad at least twice this week; same full page, same full colour. I would love for Camini Marajh to do an investigative report into the amount of money the Government of Trinidad and Tobago has spent on advertising - in particular a month-by-month comparison between January and November. It would be interesting to see in comparison to the earlier part of this year frankly because I’m of the view that the Government has funded it’s campaign through the treasury by way of Government advertising.

And that cannot be right.

About Me

To be edited as soon as I decide what I want to put here. More

Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe in a reader Or, subscribe via email:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Find entries :