The Minnows at the Cricket World Cup

Written on March 8, 2007 – 11:14 am | by Mani |
Michael Holding

Courtney Walsh, Michael Holding and Australian Captain Ricky Ponting have all come out strongly against the inclusion of the minnows in the Cricket World Cup. Who are the minnows? These are the non-Test-Playing nations that have been included into this year’s Cricket World Cup. They are Bermuda, Canada, Scotland, The Netherlands and Ireland. The ICC more politely refers to them as “ICC Associates”.

Frankly I don’t see what all the hullabaloo is about. So they don’t play test cricket, they’re not as good as us. So what? It’s actually kind of nice to see some new faces on the scene once in a while. It’s nice to see players from Ireland and Bermuda playing our game. It’s nice not to be treated to the same old fare all the time. When did we here in the WI get so high and mighty that we can dictate who can come into our little member’s club?

As far as I could remember, both Trinidad and Jamaica were once minnows in the FIFA World Cup - and such minnows we were compared to all the big names. Yet we managed to hold our own in the face of stiff competition. Even now the West Indies manage to play like minnows on occasion, so what’s wrong with letting the new kids play?

Dwayne Leverock

One of the great things about the minnows (as Rahul Dravid put it) is that they add charm to the tournament. You can’t deny that.

Watching Bermuda’s Dwayne Leverock, who knew that a 264lb man could play cricket? Who knew he could spin bowl well enough to claim 2-32 (claiming the wickets of Kevin Pietersen and Paul Collingwood)?

Of course this has reopened the fat-joke buffet that was closed when Shane Warne retired (Wait, did I just do one myself?). Some of the better ones include “Pietersen undone by wide delivery“, “Big bowling attack“, “Burly Leverock hungry for success“, “Spinner poses weighty problem“, “Dwayne Leverock does not throw his weight around back at the hotel…“, “England’s batsmen felt the pressure of the heavy roller” and “Bermuda were bowled out for 45 against England on Monday, but in 125kg spinner Dwayne Leverock they have a bowler who can turn the ball - even if he can’t turn down seconds.”

Yes, Bermuda were eventually scuttle out for 45 runs, but who knew a minnow could have England at teetering at 5-132?

On the other hand I do wonder if this inclusion is an attempt on the parts of the ICC and its sponsors to draw out the tournament in order to milk the ad revenue for as long as possible. Could be.

However, when the first round of the World Cup is over, the minnows would have been ejected and the rightful order of things would have been reestablished - that’s if the plan all comes together as it should. Surely, the possibility of an upset is not what’s driving people like Holding and Ponting to protest the minnow’s inclusion, is it? I can tell you that minnows in any tournament are capable of playing a style of the game that their opponents are unfamiliar with and therefore unable to adapt to, and that makes for unfamiliar territory and an evening, as it were, of the playing field.

And just to take the heat off Leverock a little, a bit of sledging between Warne and South Africa’s Daryll Cullinan:

Shane Warne : I’ve waited two years for another chance to humiliate you.
Daryll Cullinan : Looks like you spent it eating.

Related Posts

Put your related posts code here
  1. 6 Responses to “The Minnows at the Cricket World Cup”

  2. By Crankyputz on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    Give em a chance….what’s the big deal…and I heard Canada is doing aright…..btw, I am going to email you the schedule tracker…cuz I’m sweet like that!

  3. By Mani on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    Yeah I heard so too, I would like to see a couple upsets actually (not involving the Windies, of course). lol, well thanks, send it.

  4. By trini_talent on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    Crankyputz, looks like Tantie was there through thick and thin….scary.

  5. By Chennette on Mar 9, 2007 | Reply

    Nice article Mani!
    I like the “minnows” - cricket has to compete for attention even in our West Indian nations now with other more global sports - why would we want to deny new teams entry to the only global cricket tournament? Don’t we want cricket to survive? Wouldn’t that be better for current players - help develop and advance professional leagues so in the end, we PLAY BETTER and MORE?

  6. By ttfootball on Mar 9, 2007 | Reply

    you know, I kind of agree with Holding et al. You drew the comparison of the FIFA world cup Mani, didn’t we have to go through qualifying rounds to get to the big stage? I think they should do that and maybe have the 2 best getting to the Cricket world cup. It woudl give those associate countries a tournament of their own to compete at that level, which might even then attract new additions.

  7. By Mani on Mar 12, 2007 | Reply

    trini_talent, I think you got the post wrong, lol.

    Thanks Chennette!

    ttfootball, yeah true we did have to qualify. But at the same time that qualification isn’t perfect, there are lots of better teams that were left out in favour of T&T. I think the argument could also be made that there are too many spots in some conferences that allow minnows like T&T to gain entry. Actually I think CONCACAF was in danger of losing that half spot, if we haven’t already lost it. I don’t think Holding’s comment was completely without merit though. I’d like to see how the minnows play.

Post a Comment

About Me

To be edited as soon as I decide what I want to put here. More

Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe in a reader Or, subscribe via email:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Find entries :